If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

From around 2007, the Defendant was appointed as a separate fraud case and there is no special property and there is no certain income, while the Defendant did not intend or have ability to guarantee high-rate profits or to pay dividends on profits even if the Defendant received money from the victim E in the name of investment amounting to more than KRW 100 million in the amount of debt to be repaid to C (after the opening of name D) etc.

Nevertheless, on April 14, 2008, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay 1.5 million won interest per month only if the Defendant invested the dividend for the profit accrued from the purchase of officetels at the Defendant’s house located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 501 Dong 702.”

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, and under the pretext of investment from the victim, was a post office deposit account in the name of G, a defendant, under the name of G, under the name of the defendant, for investment money from the victim, and KRW 13 million around April 16, 2008, and KRW 10 million around the 24th day of the same month; and

5. Around September, 500, a total of KRW 43 million was remitted and acquired through deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of E, H and D;

1. G (Defendants A) specification of transactions at post offices;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of note, note of payment, certificate of borrowing, or promissory note;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;