도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. That the defendant would not once again drive drinking or drive without a license;
The circumstances, etc. are recognized.
However, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in 2010, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in several times, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months on June 13, 2017 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months on June 21, 2017, and again committed the crime of this case during the suspended sentence of 2 months since 2 months have not yet passed since the judgment became final and conclusive on June 21, 2017. Since the driving of drinking, etc. may cause significant harm to unspecified others, it is highly dangerous in society, and it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too unreasonable in light of various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and family environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.