성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, three years of suspended sentence, three years of probation, community service, 120 hours and 4.290,00 won of additional dues) is too uneased and unreasonable;
2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and it is necessary to protect the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to severely punish them even in order to establish a sound sexual culture, and even if the Defendant has already been punished for the same kind of crime, it is unfavorable for them to repeat the crime of this case.
However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s confessions and reflects the instant crime; and (c) the closure of a sexual traffic business establishment and not re-offending; (b) the method of the instant crime revealed in the records and pleadings; (c) the scale of gains acquired by the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the instant crime; and (c) various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, the
3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.