2. The judgment of the court below acknowledged the crime of this case that the defendant committed the crime of this case against his mistake, and although the total amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is not more than 869,500 won, the defendant was deemed to have been punished several times for the same crime. In particular, on August 17, 2011, this court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on several occasions on July 11, 2012, and committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period even after the execution of the above punishment was completed by Jeju Prison, which committed the crime of this case. The crime of this case was committed in the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price even if the defendant drinks and foods were potable, it cannot be seen that the defendant did not drink and drink five times during the period from February 19, 2013 to March 16, 2013, and repeated the crime of this case for a short time as not paying the price, and it cannot be viewed that the defendant had too ordinary character and behavior before and behavior of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.