2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition such as the fact that the defendant divided his mistake into depth and reflects it, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime. However, these circumstances are considered at the court below's trial and there is no change of situation otherwise in the trial. On the other hand, each of the crimes of this case is not good in light of the form of crime, frequency and interval of crime, etc., the crime of this case does not reach an agreement with the victims up to the trial, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the motive and circumstance leading to each of the crimes of this case, circumstances after the crime, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.