2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant is the owner of the “Eel” (hereinafter “the instant telecom”).

B. At around April 30, 2015, the net F was accommodated with G around 21:56, as well as G around April 30, 2015.

C. On May 1, 2015, around 01:06, the net F fells into the first floor by getting out of the stairs coming from the guest room located on the second floor of the instant telecom 205-2.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Accordingly, the deceased F was killed on May 13, 2015 after being hospitalized in the hospital and being hospitalized in the hospital, due to the injury such as cerebral cerebral cerebrovascular, etc.

E. The instant telecom has a separate parking lot on each guest room, including 205 heading, with a separate parking lot on the second floor, with a guest room on the second floor, and with a stairs between the first floor and the second floor.

F. The Plaintiffs are the children of the network F, and are the legal successors of the network F.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. There are the following defects in the instant telecom No. 205

1) The stairs installed at Nos. 205 of the instant telecoming 205 are not installed as slopes and knobs (the stairs are installed from the place where the stairs are cut off to five partitions).

In addition, the width of the stairs is narrow and high. Accordingly, there is a risk that the stairs will be lowered. 2) The upper part of the stairs that come from the guest room of 205th floor to the first floor of the instant apartment room is installed with on-and-off lights operated by the license. However, light, such as a license, is weak, and thus, it is difficult to properly disclose the stairs.

The consensus, etc. installed in the first floor parking lot shall be almost able to lower the first floor parking lot.

In other words, there is a defect that does not clarify the stairs installed in the instant telecom 205.

B. As such, this case’s Mour205, which is a structure, is defective.