집행판결
1. As to divorce case No. 08-30244 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant of the United States of America, the Circuit tour Court No. 08-30244.
1. Basic facts
A. On August 3, 2002, the Plaintiff and the Defendant moved to the United States and lived in Boston as an assistant professor at the E university located in Boston. 2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant were born between the Defendant and the Defendant, respectively, the first child G and H second child I (hereinafter collectively referred to as “children”), and the Defendant were employed as professor at the J University around August 2005, and the Defendant was employed as professor at the J University, and the Defendant was employed as a professor at the J University, and the Defendant was employed as a professor at the J University, and the Defendant was employed as a professor in Boston with his and his children.
3) The Plaintiff disputed with the Defendant in 2006, and the neighbors who observed this was the police station. The police did not arrest the Defendant, but sent the Defendant and their children to the Domestic Violence Protection Center on March 30, 2008. The Defendant assaulted the Plaintiff even on March 30, 2008, and the Defendant did not arrest the Defendant even at the time of having committed the police.
The plaintiff, with the above case, was judged to proceed to divorce with the defendant, and moved to the safety house of the Domestic Violence Protection Center.
B. On March 31, 2008, the following day, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit in the United States. On March 31, 2008, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “U.S. court”) shall be the Circuit Circuit Court, and the hereinafter “U.S. court”).
(2) On May 22, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit (DISO CA No. 08-30244) against the Plaintiff in the U.S. court. On June 10, 2008, the U.S. court rendered a decision to consolidate the case of FAPA CA No. 08-30147) with the divorce case.
3) On July 4, 2009, the Defendant, while having the limited visitation right into benching, was arrested upon having his children out of cenching cenching, following the Defendant’s arrest. Accordingly, the Defendant was indicted for the crime of statutory conspiracy. 4).