범인도피교사
Defendant
The appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months, two years of suspended sentence, and 120 hours of community service order) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.
(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Although new sentencing data was not submitted in the trial, there was no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, despite the fact that the Defendant was punished due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., he/she attempted to be relieved of punishment on the ground of a child under the influence of alcohol as a driver while driving a motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle, the circumstances and results of the instant crime, including the circumstances after the crime, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and family relationship, the lower court’s punishment is too excessive, and thus, cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.