beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.04.24 2012고단6461

사기

Text

The defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won for the crime No. 2 in the judgment of the court in four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of two years to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 7, 2010. The above judgment became final and conclusive on May 7, 2010. On February 20, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Suwon District Court for fraud.

2.21. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On January 1, 2010, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B, who was the victim B (the age of 55) located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dandong-gu Dandong-gu Dandong-si, the Dokdong-gu Do Office of Certified Dokdong-gu, was suspended from construction of the 6th class E in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul. The Defendant falsely stated that “The Dok-gu Office of Certified Dokdong-gu (the age of 55) will be suspended from construction of the

However, even if the defendant received the down payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to transfer the above down payment to the victim.

Nevertheless, on January 12, 2010, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and was given KRW 10 million from the above office as down payment by the victim.

2. On April 2010, the Defendant committed the crime against Victim F with the intent that “If the Defendant received new construction works on the G ground loans located immediately adjacent to this site from the victim F (the age of 47) in the construction site, he/she could not start the construction work due to the lack of construction cost, he/she would repay ten days after the date of repayment and make a subcontract for the removal works and civil engineering works at the construction site.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to subcontract the above construction work to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as such, and received two million won from the victim around May 3, 2010 and three million won around May 10, 2010.

Summary of Evidence

- Facts No. 1

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement by the police against B - The second fact in its holding;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.The police of F. F.