If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 17, 2016, the Defendant was found to have failed to drive drinking alcohol on September 17, 2016, the Defendant found that the slope D belonging to the Jeju East Police Station C District District of the Jeju Police Station of the Jeju Police Station had attempted to measure drinking against E, who is the Defendant’s successor.

C. The term “C. h.,” refers to “C.,” and in order to interfere with the measurement of drinking, the body of the D was fluored by several arms, and the body of the D was fluored by hand and body with the front of the D in both arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the control of drinking alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Criminal Procedure Act, shall be taken into account all of the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant argument, and in particular, the circumstances that appear to reflect the following circumstances: The circumstances that have no record of crime between the last 10 years: The extent of exercising the tangible power is relatively minor.