폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.
2. Considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (b) the victim’s consent does not want the punishment of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant committed contingent crimes; and (d) the Defendant’s spouse’s health appears to be not good; or (c) the instant crime was committed at one time by using two beer disease, which is an object dangerous to brooms, with the face of the victim at one time; (d) the victim’s face was exposed to the treatment days, and the relevant crime was committed in bad quality in light of the applicable criminal law; (c) the Defendant was punished for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (on night time). Considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, the lower court appears to have reduced the statutory penalty for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; and (d) the Defendant’s motive and circumstance leading up to the Defendant’s death or injury before and after the commission of the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant’s argument that the Defendant’s punishment could not be considered unreasonable before and after the commission of the Defendant’s argument.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.