Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On July 15, 2016, the Defendant stated that the Defendant would immediately pay the expenses for the completion of the service at the time when the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the expenses for the pre-service, even if he received the delivery of the pre-service, at the office of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “E”).

In fact, on August 10, 2016, from the injured party who believed this, he acquired financial profits equivalent to the same amount by failing to pay the price even though he received the supply of 35 million son and mother from the Navy around August 10, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A detailed statement of account transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (victim D telephone communications);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;