beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.04.21 2016고단843

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등

Text

Defendant

A, with respect to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below, he shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months and imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

2016 Highest 843 [Defendants]

1. On February 17, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 7, 2010, and on December 12, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and two months of suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 8, 2013.

2. On January 27, 2010, Defendant B was released on September 30, 2010, when he/she was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s wooden Branch, and was released on September 30, 2010, and the parole period expired on November 21, 2010. On August 24, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2016.

3. On November 19, 2009, Defendant C was released on June 30, 2010 after having been sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in the Gwangju District Court’s Support for the Promotion of the Gwangju District Court, and the parole period expired on August 10, 2010. On October 1, 2015, Defendant C was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Speculative Regulation and Punishment in the Southern Branch of the Gwangju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 31, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendants A and B operated an illegal game room where the outcome of a game product can be exchanged. Defendants A and B conspired to take charge of physical color of a game room where the game product can be exchanged, introduction of the registered owner of the game room, management of the game room, etc. Defendant B conspired to take charge of the purchase and installation of game machine, the overall business management of the game room, the exchange place, and the employment of employees.

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on April 25, 201, the Defendants conspired to install a 40 game machine of “Acuadrops” in “F amusement room” located on the second floor, Namnam-gun E-2.