When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 8, 2018, the Defendant, at a restaurant where it is impossible to know the name located in the Guri-ri city at around 22:50, after drinking alcohol, had a substitute driver drive a motor vehicle with BAD, using an agency driving service, and refused to pay the substitute driver's fee under the influence of alcohol while the Defendant was under the Defendant's house located in the city of Hari. In order to receive the substitute driver's fee, the Defendant driven the said motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle and driving the motor vehicle in C in order to receive the substitute driver's fee.

Police Station D District was set up as D.

At around 23:16 on the same day, the Defendant reported that the police officers belonging to the above D D were to contact the Defendant’s wife and seek to resolve the problem of the payment of operating expenses on behalf of the Defendant, and that he received the request for the examination from the police officers of this country.

J. N. N. L. L. L. L. L.D.;

Along with the Majority’s view that the instant E was “Chewing,” and that, in order for the said E to be genuine by the Defendant, the said E’s croc part was received once from the Defendant’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the protection of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the field and CCTV closure photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, abused a police officer’s coin as his head under the influence of alcohol.

Although the nature of a crime is not good, the defendant does not want to punish the defendant by mutual consent with the police officer of the victimized person, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the same crime or fine.

The defendant has mistakenly recognized his mistake.

In addition, various factors of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., are integrated.