beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.08.30 2017구합50519

강등처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 12, 2004, the Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman, and was promoted to the reduction on March 11, 2014. From July 20, 2015 to July 14, 2016, the Plaintiff served as a female juvenile leader of the B police station from July 20 to July 14, 2016.

B. On August 3, 2016, the Defendant, following the resolution of the General Disciplinary Committee of the Incheon Metropolitan City Provincial Police Agency, took disciplinary action (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff as the grounds for the following disciplinary action.

On February 2, 2016, the Plaintiff made a statement of sexual harassment on two occasions, such as ① “Isn't know at the time when Isn's first office was located in the office,” “Isn't know at the time Isn's first office,” and “Isn't know that Isn't have been sn't in the house,” and “Isn't have been sn't in the house,” and “Isn't have been sn't have been sn't in the house,” and “Isn't have been sn't have been sn't have been sn't been sn't have been sn't have been sn't have been sn't been sn't have been sn't have been sn't have been sn't have been sn't have been sn't have been sn't have been s.

(hereinafter “Grounds for Disciplinary Action 1”). Around December 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) (i) obtained a female juvenile-related certificate from the D Senior Superintendent, a subordinate employee, in lieu of a female juvenile-related certificate; (b) requested by the Plaintiff to take an examination for about one month from February to February 3, 2016; (c) obtained four qualification certificates, such as a psychological counselor, in the Plaintiff’s name; and (b) from January 7, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained four qualification certificates, such as a psychological counselor, in the Plaintiff’s name.

6. By the end of June 27, 200, D police station entrance service is replaced by D police station entrance service on the ground that the duties of D police officer, who is a subordinate employee, are bad, etc. for a total of six occasions, and ③ call to D police officer, who is a subordinate employee, around 19:00 on May 19, 2016 and bring the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the police station.