However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2012. 6. 15.경부터 2012. 6. 18.까지 광주 광산구 D 건물 2층에 있는 피고인이 운영하는 “E”에서, 게임장 손님들이 게임점수에 따라 게임기로부터 배출되는 아이템카드를 불상의 환전업자들에게 1장당 5,000원 상당에 매도하여 환전한다는 점을 이용하여, 등급을 받은 내용과는 달리 이용자의 조작과 능력에 관계없이 이른바 똑딱이를 통해 자동적으로 게임진행이 가능하고, 우연한 방법에 의한 무작위 확률로 당첨구간이 존재하여 게임점수가 획득되어 이에 따라 아이템카드가 배출되는 등으로 개변조된 적벽대전2 게임기 40대를 설치하고 손님들에게 제공하여 게임장 영업을 하였다.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the classified contents, and operated a speculative act using a speculative gaming device as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response to enforcement support;

1. Article 45 subparagraph 4 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry and Article 32 (1) 2 (the provision of game products different from those of the game products rated) of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined, considering the fact that the defendant has led to the crime of this case, the running period of the game room of this case is not long, and the defendant has no record of being sentenced to imprisonment or more severe punishment for the same kind of crime, etc.