However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 207, the Defendant, along with C (one person referred to as “D”), intended to engage in disguised marriage in order to obtain domestic status of stay at a place where the domicile of the People’s Republic of China is unknown at a place where the domicile of the People’s Republic of China is unknown, and C proposed a false marriage report to G through E and F residing in Gangwon-do original state, and G accepted it in return for receiving KRW 6 million.

1. Around December 24, 2007, the Defendant entered false information, such as public electronic records, etc., on or around December 24, 2007, after copying C, E, F, G, and the Defendant, together with G, posted a photograph necessary for reporting marriage, and prepared documents necessary for reporting marriage.

On January 16, 2008, G around 09:30, at the interesting Myeon Office located in the interesting Myeon Office located in the interesting Dog-si, the fact was prepared as if the defendant had been married normally without the intention to maintain the marital relationship, and submitted the name to the public official of the above Myeon office where the name cannot be known.

A public official in charge of the above family register who is unaware of such circumstance was computerized into the actual marriage of the defendant and G in the family relation registration information processing system of the defendant and G.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E, F, G, etc., made a false report, and made a false report to enter false facts in the same electronic records register as the original of a notarial deed.

2. The Defendant conspiredd with G et al. to exercise events, such as false entry and electronic records, and exercised the above family relation register by having the aforementioned fact-finding record kept at the above interesting Myeon office at that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant or G by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G, F, E, or H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (in cases of submitting a copy of recorded paper for delivery of money as a suspect);

1. Relevant Article 228(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act ( point of false entry of public electronic records) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the poor entry under Articles 229 and 30 of the Criminal Act;