beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.10.28 2020고정211

보험사기방지특별법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B, C, and the defendant are in a friendly relationship, and D and E are people who have met through Internet carpet meetings.

B, C, the Defendant, and D had intentionally caused a traffic accident on the part of vehicles changing course in collusion with insurance fraud, and had the intent to receive insurance proceeds from the insurance company, pretending to be a contingent traffic accident.

The part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that it does not materially disadvantage the defendant's defense right.

B found that, around December 19:30 on December 2, 2019, the passenger car from the F AW to the back seat, and that, around December 19:30 on December 2, 2019, the same direction was on the same road as the East-line Road located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Sungdong-gu, and that, around December 2, 2019, HST6 passenger car driving by G from the front section of B was changed from the fourth to three lanes.

Accordingly, B was bound by the three-lanes as it is, and was installed in front of the right side of the above SM6 vehicle, and intentionally received the left side of the above SM6 vehicle.

Defendant, B, etc. continued to receive an accident as if the accident occurred due to negligence in the course of duty by phone call to an employee in the name of the victim I company who is an insurance company of the above Abdon and SM6 vehicle at the site of the accident.

The defendant, B, etc. conspired to deception the damaged company, thereby acquiring insurance proceeds from the victimized company or acquiring insurance proceeds from the third party. However, he/she failed to make a confession of E during his/her work.

Summary of Evidence

1. The written statement of G concerning the witness E’s legal statement B and the police interrogation protocol G of the police interrogation protocol of the suspect Eul concerning the witness E’s partial statement, each investigation report by the suspect D is identified, and the Internet site, the prior text of the intentional accident which the suspect E received with the suspect C, the text sent and received by the suspect E prior to the occurrence of the accident, and the Fabbox video related to the Fabox.