특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 1, 2013, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million by obstructing the performance of official duties by the Seoul Western District Court, and on August 24, 2015, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of destroying property in the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court on August 24, 2015, and was in total two times, and the force of obstructing the performance of official duties of the same kind was in total six times.
1. On June 1, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault against a driver) conducted so as to have passengers in the atmosphere on the street above the above point of the victim F (64 years old) with the influence of distinguishing things or lacking decision-making capacity by drinking alcohol around 23:20 on June 1, 2016, in order to have them take aboard, and without any justifiable reason after going through the top door door of the victim F (64 years old) driving in the U.S., the Defendant continued to hold the victim's breath in order to put the victim's breath to another passenger, and when the victim got the victim's breath and cell phone approaching the above net after approaching the victim's body from the above taxi, and after having assaulted the victim in front of the above taxi, the victim's breath and the victim's breath continued to open the victim's 2nd hand by opening the victim's left hand.
2. On June 1, 2016, at around 23:40 on June 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against F while exercising violence at the places listed in paragraph (1) at the 1stm of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station H District, which was called “I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, and I see, I’s face at one time.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.
(i) the evidence;