2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Defendant C is the head of the management office of H apartment in Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”); Defendant D is the president of the council of occupants’ representatives; Defendant E is the director; Defendant F is the auditor; Defendant G is the I Dong representative.

B. The plaintiff A is the auditor of the tenant representative of the apartment of this case, and the plaintiff B is the form of the plaintiff A and the Jdong representative of the apartment of this case.

C. On January 24, 2016, Plaintiff A filed an accusation against the said Defendants, stating that “In collusion with Defendant C and Defendant D about the execution of apartment management expenses by making a resolution on unfluoring the construction cost or making a false construction, Plaintiff A committed occupational breach of trust, occupational embezzlement, and document fabrication, and Defendant E and Defendant F F aided and abetted it.”

Defendant F is as of January 28, 2016, Defendant F, at the Kimpo Police Station around December 12, 2016, “Plaintiff B” as of January 28, 2016.

3. 31. After the council of occupants’ representatives, indecent act by compulsion was committed on two occasions at the meeting place, and Defendant D et al. observed this.

E. Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G had prepared a resident public hearing to report the audit results, etc., but, on February 8, 2017, the council of occupants’ representatives was held and the case on which Plaintiff A filed a complaint with Kimpo Police Station was notified that is different from the facts, and the resident public hearing promoted by Plaintiff A was decided not to approve the case. Accordingly, the Defendants were punished by indecent acts committed by Plaintiff B on the same day, but they did not hear the horses.

Plaintiff

A The case in which a complaint was filed against the apartment of this case is an act of false accusation and defamation committed without any evidence.

Plaintiff

A Public hearings to be held by A are merely private public hearings which have not been approved by the council of occupants' representatives, and cannot be permitted.

‘Public Notice No. 5' containing the content is ‘Public Notice No. 5'(hereinafter referred to as ‘Public Notice of this case'

A notice was posted on the apartment of this case.