A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

Seized evidence Nos. 4, 6, 17.

[criminal power] On July 29, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for property damage, etc. at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court on July 29, 2015, and Defendant B was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) in the same court on November 20, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Suwon Detention House on July 24, 2016.

Defendants and victims C (years 21), D (years 21), and E (years 20) were related to social post-age, and they participated in the so-called "F"-called violent crime group in Jeonju and Seoul Gangnam-gu around November 2017, which is an organization of violence crime that is active in Jeonju and Jeonnam-gu in Seoul, and participated in the marriage ceremony and events of the staff members of the FF affiliated in the Jeonbuk-si in the Jeonbuk-si.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A’s coercion;

A. On November 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00, at the H coffee shop located in G in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) based on the fact that the Defendant was scheduled as a superior organization of the victim E society and violent crime group, the Defendant instructed the victim to “the victim, using the fact that the Defendant opened a cell phone core chip under the victim’s name, with filling 20,000 won, after opening the cell phone core chip under the victim’s name; and (c) the victim, considering that the failure to comply with the above instructions, was likely to cause harm to the victim’s body, etc., the victim, at around that time, opened the cell phone core

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim to commit an act of non-performance of obligation.

B. At around 16:00 on December 1, 2017, the Defendant ordered the victims to open a cell phone prepaid chip under the name of the victim C and D with charge of 20,000 won, taking advantage of the fact that the Defendant was scheduled to be a superior organization of the victim C and the victim D’s community line and violent crime group. The Defendant ordered the victims to “the victims to open a cell phone prepaid chip under the name of the victim, with charge of charging 20,000 won,” and the failure to comply with the above instruction