beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.12.23 2020고단5114

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall provide game products for the distribution or use of the contents different from those of the rating, or display or keep such products for such purposes.

The contents of the “clocker’s game work”, which is rated by the Game Industry Management Committee, include a “indirect shock” method of purchasing Ababa and game money, after making customers directly account and filling online without any separate manager.

Nevertheless, from April 2020 to July 2, 2020, the Defendant installed five computers on the 1st floor of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and operated “C” game products, and provided a large number of unspecified customers with “balker’s game products,” which differs from the content of the rating as above, provided IDs made in advance through a separate manager page to customers, and received cash directly from customers, and then allowed them to use game products using “direct shock” method.

As a result, the defendant provided game products different from the contents of the classification to customers for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection (violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act), a report on internal investigation (field situation), a control report, and a report on the results of appraisal;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry Promotion, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act that are disadvantageous to the defendant: The defendant has the same criminal records.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant recognized all the crimes of this case, and reflects them.

The above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and motive for committing the crime.