In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the above fine shall be paid on 100.

On July 31, 2014, at around 02:45, the Defendants reported to the police in order to request the assistance of Defendant B, who is a driver on the roadside on the roadside, under the influence of alcohol, on the front side of the packing edge of D located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Defendant

B은 위 신고를 받고 출동한 서울중부경찰서 E지구대 소속 경장 F에게 피고인 A를 택시에 태워 집에 보내달라고 하였으나 F이 “동거하는 사이니까 직접 택시를 타고 가는 게 났지 않느냐.”며 이를 거부했다는 이유로 F에게 “이 새끼야 민중의 지팡이가 신고를 했으면 집까지 데려다 줄 것이지 뭔 말이 많아 씹쌔끼야 개새끼야.”라고 욕설을 하고, 바닥에 누워 있던 피고인 A는 갑자기 일어나 손으로 F의 멱살을 잡고, 경사 G가 이를 제지하려고 하자 다른 한손으로 G의 멱살을 잡는 등으로 폭행하고, 피고인 B은 위 지구대 소속 경사 H이 지원요청을 받고 사건 현장으로 출동하여 동영상을 촬영하자 H에게 “뭘 찍냐, 야 이 씹할놈아.”라고 욕설을 하면서 주먹으로 H의 좌측 손을 때리는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, G, and H;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The selective Defendants: (a) although the Defendants’ act of fine selection cannot be deemed as an unfair infringement against legitimate public authority, the Defendants’ act of fine selection is not less severe; (b) the Defendants did not bear the degree of assault; (c) the Defendants committed the instant crime in a contingent manner; (d) even though the nature of the Defendant A’s crime is relatively better, there was no record of punishment other than that of a fine imposed once by fine; and (c) Defendant did not have