When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

The defendant is a person who operates a camera in the Internet, from B to C to D to A.

Author's property rights and other property rights protected pursuant to this Act shall not be infringed by means of reproduction, performance, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, lending, preparation of derivative works.

Nevertheless, around October 2013, the defendant opened the above car page using a computer at his office in the Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, and operated the file, which is the author's property right of the Round program, without the permission of the complainant.

The access to the above car page was circulated, transmitted, and shared to the persons who became members.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of the police accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the amount of fine stipulated in the summary order of this case cannot be deemed to be imposed in light of the following: (a) the background and consequence of the above case; (b) the act of the accused before and after the commission of the crime; (c) whether the