If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

From July 2010 to March 13, 2012, the Defendant was engaged in activities as a member of the E-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council, and was engaged in an election campaign to make the F elected as the status of election campaign workers from March 29, 201 to March 13, 2012 with respect to the election of the 19th National Assembly members from December 19, 201 to March 13, 201, the election campaign manager of the D preliminary candidate F for the Seongbuk-gu Seoul local constituency A, volunteers from March 13, 2012, and again, election campaign workers from March 29, 2012

According to the Public Official Election Act, no one shall publish false facts about any person who intends to be a candidate or candidate in communication or by other means to be disadvantageous to any person who intends to be a candidate or candidate for the purpose of preventing him/her from being elected.

On November 13, 2011, when the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Election of National Assembly Members A, Preliminary Candidates for Local Assembly Members H worked as the 18th National Assembly member affiliated with I, the Republic of Korea and the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea-U.S. FTA") began with a simple sense after he/she ratified by an agreement, consented by the National Assembly violence, and sought the assistance of the National Assembly members, and continued to attend the plenary session of the National Assembly on November 22, 2011 and continued to exist for at least 10 days until it is authorized.

Around March 2, 2012, the Defendant, as above, only 10 piecesed to the consent of the ratification of the Korea-U.S. FTA and the amendment of the National Assembly Act to prevent violence in the National Assembly in accordance with the Korea-U.S. FTA in the Republic of Korea. However, although there was no fact that some media expressed the draft consent to ratification of the Korea-U.S. FTA in a critical point of view, the Defendant’s Twitter prepared the Defendant’s Twitter and opened up the Defendant’s Twitter “HOUT f1 et al., which was rapidly cut off from the MUT f1 et al., and published the Defendant’s Twitter “T 1,000” and the Defendant’s Twitter “NUT f1,000” and the Defendant’s Twitter linked to the aforesaid Twitter.