If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On August 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a bicycle with ATV WOW-100 4 wheeled motor device that was not registered without a motor device driver’s license in approximately 1.3 km section from the Do of 2982-15, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, the other party to the road in the same Gu, Sungnam-si, to the front road in the same Gu C.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, who is equipped with a motor device as provided in paragraph (1), operated a bicycle on the road which is not covered by automobile mandatory insurance at the time and place as provided in paragraph (1), despite being well aware of the fact that he is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, and photographs of the scene of accidents;

1. Application of the laws and subordinate statutes of GaTV WOW-100 photographs (ATV WOW-100) of non-licensed operating circumstances, notification of detection of non-registered low-water sources

1. Relevant Article 154 subparagraph 2 of the Criminal Act, Article 154 and Article 43 of the Criminal Act (unlicensed Driving) concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 46 (2) 2, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is under unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant operates the same stoba and has been punished for the same crime. However, considering the following favorable circumstances: (a) the defendant led to confession by the defendant; (b) the defendant operated the above stoba for his livelihood as a class 3 disability (non-performance function); (c) the defendant submitted the scrapped materials after the issuance of the summary order; and (d) the defendant did not repeat the crime; and (c) the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime.