However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is an employee of the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D in the Chungcheong-gun C.

1. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of June 24, 2013, at the above restaurant: (a) around 20:00, the Defendant falsely stated that “Around June 24, 2013, the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant died of the Plaintiff by getting off and getting off the Oraban; (d) the amount of the agreement that was written off should be 30 years at the bar; (b) the Defendant had to live in the security house; and (c) if the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million, the Defendant would have paid off the amount of the provided credit by August 24, 2014.”

However, in fact, the defendant's omission did not cause the plaintiff to die, and the defendant made a false statement to the victim by requiring money due to debt repayment, living expenses, etc., and the defendant did not have to waive the time limit money, and the defendant was living with the defendant's living with the benefit of KRW 1,300,000 per month without any special property, even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to make repayment at the time agreed.

The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim’s seat to the account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 30, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of October 30, 2013, the Defendant stated in the above restaurant that “The Defendant would make a mortgage on the house located in Vietnam and would have to pay money to the victim D. There is money to the husband in Vietnam. There is no money to the husband in Korea. However, the Defendant would lend money to the husband in the Republic of Korea while he said it is necessary to pay the money to the husband in the form of KRW 10 million with the deposit for the lease before her husband’s husband. If he/she lends money to the husband in the Republic of Korea, he/she would pay the money after one year.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a mortgage on a house in Vietnam, and made a false statement to the victim by requiring money due to debt repayment, living expenses, etc., and the Defendant did not have to withdraw the time limit money, and was living with the benefit of KRW 1,300,000 per month without any special property.