A. The punishment of the lower court (one hundred thousand won for imprisonment with labor for up to eight months and for collection) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime related to narcotics is a serious criminal with severe social harm and risk of recidivism, and the crime of this case is committed during the period of suspension of execution of the same criminal act, which is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant visited the earth area to undergo the administration of narcotics voluntarily; and (b) the Defendant reflects his mistake; and (c) there is no special circumstance or circumstance that may newly be considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive and circumstance of the offense; (b) the motive and circumstance of the offense; and (c) the means and method of the offense; and (d) the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the present arguments and records, such as the circumstances after the commission of the offense, it

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's assertion are not accepted.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor with the conclusion are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.