However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 13, 2020 from around 00:00 to 06:40 on February 13, 2020, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim D with a locked door, which was operated by the victim D; and (b) stolen the victim’s market price located at the display site, with a single account amounting to KRW 50,300,00.

2. At around 01:15, Feb. 29, 2020, the Defendant: (a) discovered a car free-to-land owned by the victim B that was parked in the F apartment underground parking lot in the city of Jinjin-si; (b) opened a car free-to-faceless driver car; and (c) opened a car free-to-face, and kept in custody of the vehicle into and received from the vehicle, and stolen KRW 1.8 million in cash.

3. On March 12, 2020, at night, the Defendant: (a) intruded into the room by using a string door, which had been locked by the victim I Ha in J-si, the victim I Ha, at night; and (b) 40,00 won in cash owned by the victim from the lower part of the victim’s cresh, which was locked by the victim; and (c) stolen the victim’s money from the lower part of the victim’s cresh that was locked.

Summary of Evidence

[Attachment 1]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on internal investigation (h business statement hearing and attaching CCTV images);

1. The defendant's legal statement in a CD (fact 2) including CCTV images;

1. A statement of damage B;

1. A CD in the white industry, such as CCTV images (the third fact);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there was only a match because they knew that the J building K became an empty space, such as CCTV images.

However, in this Court, the victim I clearly stated to the effect that “At the time, a person similar to the defendant was satisfyed at a place where he had been in possession of a plan, and satisfyed to get out of the defect, such as he was to satisfy,” and that only satisfy in a wall at the time when satisfy does not exist.” The defendant may enter K.