A. Defendant B Law Firm shall be from January 11, 2014 with respect to KRW 204,500,000 and KRW 200 million among them.

(a) The facts under recognition are either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 7, Eul 1, 2, and 5;

1) Attorneys F-at-law around June 2012, 2012, G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).

2) The Plaintiff running the Plaintiff Company H (hereinafter “subject company”)

2) On June 19, 2012, F entered into an ero-related contract (Evidence 2) with the purport that “F shall deposit KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00.

3 The F, on June 19, 2012, deposited KRW 300 million in the Escro account managed by Defendant B, which was issued by the Plaintiff, in accordance with the said contract.

Defendant B, the attorney at Defendant B, entered the other party to the preparation of a certificate of custody in F on the same day as F, and entered the other party to the preparation of the certificate of custody in F, the purpose of custody: Sck for the acquisition of the shares and management rights of the subject company, the time of return: The time of return on June 26, 2012; the conditions of return:

1. If an underwriting contract for the shares and management rights of the target company is not concluded by the above time of return, such shares and management rights shall be refunded to F in exchange for cash storage;

2. Upon conclusion of an underwriting agreement for a target company, a person who is engaged in the I Company Merger and the funding brokerage business with the F’s consent and who is also engaged in the F’s stock and management right acquisition 45 billion won.