Even upon examining the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the crime of forging private documents and the crime of aiding and abetting documents, or by misapprehending the rules of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the crime of forging

Meanwhile, under Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, the argument that the determination of a sentence is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.