beta
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2015.10.28 2015가단4298

공유물분할

Text

1. The remaining amount of each real estate listed in the separate sheet after deducting the auction cost from each price.

Reasons

1. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet is jointly owned by the plaintiffs and the defendant according to the shares listed in the separate sheet. An agreement on the method of division was not concluded. In light of the location, size, form, use status, value of each of the above real estate after division, the number of co-owners, relationship between co-owners, etc., the value of each real estate can not be divided in kind or may be reduced remarkably due to the division.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Therefore, it is recognized that it is reasonable to resolve the co-ownership of each of the above real estate by selling it at auction and distributing the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from each of the proceeds of sale in accordance with the ratio of shares between the plaintiffs and the defendant.