beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.03.24 2017고단183

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2016, the Defendant received 112 reports from “C cafeteria” located in Silung-si B, 23:30 on December 19, 2016, the Defendant sent back the restaurant entrance to the restaurant, cut off the amba self-collection door to enable the Defendant, who was drunk, to return home to the site after having arrived at the site, and arrived at the site by F, and then cut off the said F’s hand by plucking, plucking, plucking the finger, bucking the balthm, and cutting off the f’s hand, and booming the f’s hand, making the f’s hand away by cutting off the f’s hand and cutting off the f’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Prior to the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant was punished by a fine due to a crime of interference with the performance of official duties of the same kind or a crime of violation of road traffic law, and the Defendant again took an excessive drinking and committed the instant crime after committing the instant crime. However, the Defendant appears to have caused the instant crime by contingency, the Defendant seems to have committed the instant crime, his depth and reflects, and efforts were made to recover damage by depositing a certain amount for the victimized police officer, and other factors for sentencing as indicated in the trial process, including the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, background of the instant crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., shall be comprehensively determined as ordered.