However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:20 on July 5, 2018, the Defendant driven a D-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with D AW-Wood sports.

On July 5, 2018, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.108% with blood alcohol concentration around 00:20 on July 5, 2018, and proceeds at a speed of approximately KRW 169.6 km in speed from the ebbbal intersection to the eb.g., in the middle-gu middle-gu technologies, the flow of the two lanes from the ebal intersection to the ebal intersection.

A lane has been changed into one lane.

At the time, the speed limit is 80km per hour, and the defendant's direction is at the same 1-lane taxi operated by the victim E (53 years old) at the same time. In such a case, there was a duty of care to change the lane in a way that does not cause any danger or damage to others by maintaining the speed limit and accurately operating the steering and steering gear of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant is proceeding at a speed exceeding 20 km per hour.

In order to avoid the vehicle driven at the two-lanes of the Defendant’s running direction, the part behind the above rocketing cab was taken as the front part of the sports vehicle in front of the said Amwel cab, and due to its shock, the part on the left side of the HW-man car of the victim G(55 years old) driving in the same direction where the said Amwel cab is driving over two-lanes in the same direction, was taken as the front part of the said Amwel cab.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.