2. The judgment of the defendant is contradictory to the defendant's confession of the crime of this case, the defendant expressed his/her will to seek a favorable punishment against the defendant until the victim's bereaved family members reach the trial as well as the investigation process by mutual consent with the victim's bereaved family members, and the defendant has no criminal records other than being punished once due to the same kind of crime in the past. However, the defendant caused the traffic accident of this case by negligence of violating his/her duty to observe the most important and basic signals in the operation of the motor vehicle, and the defendant caused the traffic accident of this case due to the negligence of violating his/her duty to observe the basic signals, which led to the result that the defendant's negligence is very serious, which results in the victim's death, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the above unfair sentencing argument of the defendant and his/her defense

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.