When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who has been working as a used motor vehicle with a used vehicle C located in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Where a motor vehicle dealer advertises a motor vehicle via the Internet, he/she shall not provide the history of the motor vehicle and its seller information, etc. in a false manner.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2014. 4. 17.경 위 ‘C’ 사무실에서 인터넷 네이버 D에 실제로 보유하고 있지 아니하여 판매할 수 없는 ‘트라젯XG’, 'E' 자동차에 대하여 ‘연식 2005년형’, ‘주행 63,000km’, 판매가 '140만원' 등이라고 게재하여 광고함으로써 위 자동차의 이력을 허위로 제공하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Internet closure, such as Internet closure photographs, etc.;

1. Article 80 applicable to facts constituting an offense, Article 80 subparagraph 7-2 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 58 (3) of the same Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;