A. On May 23, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased real estate (hereinafter “the instant commercial building”) as indicated in the attached list from the Korea-Japan Real Estate Products Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Real Estate Products”) (hereinafter “Korea Real Estate Products”).

B. On June 25, 1996, the Defendant, the former owner of the commercial building of this case, concluded a lease contract at KRW 2.5 million and KRW 150,000 on a yearly basis, and renewed the lease contract at KRW 13.6m2 (hereinafter “the lease contract between the Defendant and the real estate company of this case”) in sequence with each point of the attached Form 7, 8, 9, 10,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18, and 7 on the second floor of the ground among the real estate listed in the attached Table list (hereinafter “the lease contract between the Defendant and the real estate company of this case”). < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 15083, Jun. 25, 1996; Presidential Decree No. 15080, Jun. 24, 197>

B. On May 23, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant as of KRW 2.5 million, monthly rent of KRW 650,00,000, monthly management expenses, monthly management expenses of KRW 75,000, and the first lease agreement as of June 24, 1997, and received a confirmation of the purport that the Plaintiff is in possession and use. The Plaintiff acquired the instant lease agreement from Korea-U.S. Co., Ltd. on the sole basis that it would succeed to the instant lease agreement.

After acquiring the instant commercial building, on January 20, 2014, the Plaintiff expressed to the Defendant that the lease contract will not be renewed upon the expiration of the lease term on May 22, 2014. In other words, on May 21, 2014, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant by content-certified mail a notice stating that the instant store will not be renewed upon the expiration of the lease term.

Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap 1's evidence, Gap 1's evidence, Gap 2, 3's evidence, Gap 4's evidence and arguments.