2. The judgment below's punishment is too unreasonable in light of various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, background and result of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., although it is acknowledged that the defendant committed the crime and the complainant did not want the punishment against the defendant, it is hard to view that the punishment of the judgment below is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the defendant has the history of punishment several times; (b) the defendant handled legal affairs such as the preparation of a letter of claim seizure and assignment order as the head of the attorney-at-law office; and (c) the amount received from the complainant is too large;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.