If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

At around 01:38 on August 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought the above C District on the ground that the police officer’s measures on the matters he reported to 112 were not taken on her 112 on the ground that she was not on her mother, and (b) expressed that “A victim D (Nam, 23 years of age) who was a policeman belonging to the said C District group (“E”) who was a policeman of the said C District group, called “I ambling and booming on the report that she drinkss and wraps on the E, will ambling, will ambling, and will do so at one time at the right hand of the victim’s right hand, and continued to read “I ambling the police dog on the other side of the victim’s left hand”.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and at the same time, the victim suffered bodily harm, such as light spawn for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Investigation report (case concerning recording and recording 112 reported);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Data from CCTV photographs in a district;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs of victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;