On September 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the attempted larceny of structures at night at a district court on September 15, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at a governmental prison on October 27, 2015.

On June 18, 2016, the Defendant listened to the phrase “a bicycle with the wheels in front of the department department store, which is a string, is stolen, because the bicycle was stolen because the bicycle was not locked,” which was 846, G, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul. From around June 18, 2016, the Defendant considered the phrase “a bicycle was stolen.”

At around 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant, at around 18:00 on the same day, stolen the Defendant’s bicycle 1,50,000 won at the market price owned by the victim C, which was installed and kept unlocked in front of the department store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 329 (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes: The fact that there exists a history of having been sentenced to imprisonment, etc. for a single crime several times, and in particular, the circumstances favorable to the fact that the instant crime was committed again during the repeated crime period: the degree of damage is not significant: The degree of punishment under Article 35 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc., the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing