상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In relation to Paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court below, the defendant of mistake of facts did not dispute with the victim and did not inflict any injury, and in relation to Paragraph 3 of the judgment of the court below, there was a fact that the victim's arms were used in the process of threatening the victim to assault F, but he did not inflict any injury upon the victim's body due to drinking and growth. The court below found the defendant guilty of all the charges of each injury of this case. The judgment of the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting
B. The punishment sentenced by the court below (the first crime of the original decision: imprisonment with prison labor for two months, one year of suspension of execution, and the second and third crimes in the decision of the court below: imprisonment with prison labor for five months) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination:
A. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the victim stated at an investigative agency to the effect that the victim suffered an injury by assault as stated in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the judgment below; (ii) each injury diagnosis statement corresponds to the victim’s above statement; and (iii) the defendant made a confession as to paragraph (2) of the judgment of the court below on the first day; and (iii) the defendant made a statement to the effect that the investigative agency made a brupt and carried out physical fighting (as stated in the judgment of the court below, paragraph (3) of the judgment of the court below, the defendant made a confession as to paragraph (3) of the judgment of the court below; and (iv) the defendant made a statement to the effect that the bru
B. On February 10, 201, the Seoul Central District Court has a record of having been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, etc., and in particular, on February 10, 201, the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapon, etc.) due to an act threatening the victim of the instant case and an injury to the victim.