대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation of a specialized management entity that performs services related to housing redevelopment projects, and the Defendant is the chairman of the Ulsan-gu Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “Committee”) that promotes redevelopment projects within Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “instant redevelopment projects”) within the size of 62,120 square meters from the total project site of Ulsan-gu and 320 square meters.
B. On June 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the instant rearrangement project with the residents’ general meeting organized by the said Committee as a specialized management company for the rearrangement project related to the redevelopment project of this case. On July 12, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the rearrangement project with the said Committee for vicarious performance of services, support, and lending of project costs (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project contract”). The main contents relating to the scope of services under the instant rearrangement project service contract and the lending of project costs are as follows.
Article 3 (Scope of Services) (1) "Plaintiff" shall conduct the following affairs on his/her behalf or support pursuant to Article 69 (1) of the Do Administration Act:
1. An agency for affairs concerning the application for authorization to establish an association;
2. Review on feasibility and preparation of an implementation plan for a rearrangement project;
3. Support for the selection of a designer or contractor;
4. Vicarious execution of affairs concerning application for authorization of implementation;
5. Vicarious execution of affairs concerning the formulation of management and disposal plans;
6. Holding general meetings (excluding personnel support for daily workers, such asO/S and security service);
7. Support for dissolution of an association;
8. Support for and consultation on the selection of collaborative companies;
9.The time and proportion of service costs to be paid by the “Committee” and Article 4 (Timing and Ratio of Payment of Service Costs) (1) “Committee” to “Plaintiff” shall be as follows:
1. Up to 30 days after the contract is concluded (by VAT);
2. 30 percent not exceeding 30 days after authorization for the establishment of a partnership is granted (VAT Map);
3. Within 30 days after the authorization of construction deliberation is granted.
4. Within 30 days after the authorization for project implementation is granted.