When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the head of the on-site management office who manages agricultural products selling copons in Ilyang-gu, U.S. C, and is the person who manages all the products including the country of origin labeling.

No one shall put a false mark of origin on the raw materials of agricultural and fishery products or processed agricultural and fishery products, or put a mark likely to cause confusion thereon.

The Defendant purchased 135 km (the purchase price of KRW 6,035,50) at the second domestic risk (the country of origin) of China, “Korea, China, and China,” from the Free International Bank of Bank of Korea, and the same year from January 20, 2014.

3. up to 14.15.6 g of 115.6 g of 100 g of 100 g of 115.66 g of 100 g of 100 (sale amount to 6,939,600 g of 100) and the country of origin is indicated on the boiler as "domestic products", and the product show and sells to many unspecified consumers with a mark that is likely to cause confusion as to the country of origin by means of "large country and domestic products", and as above, the product show and sells 13 g of 180 g of 180 g of 180 g of n of 100 local products at the risk of confusion as to the country of origin.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on an offender (including evidence Nos. 2 and 3 of the attached documents);

1. To apply a report on investigation (to secure purchase details at risk) and a copy of a certificate of employment;

1. Article 14 and Article 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 6 (1) 1 of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.