However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 2, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court’s Port Branch, and on November 7, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime in the same court.

On July 7, 2019, at around 09:00, the Defendant driven DK 3 automobiles in the state of alcohol with approximately 4km alcohol concentration of about 0.146% from the 4km section to the front road of the Posi-gu B C store in the north-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same criminal records as a suspect);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the choice of imprisonment, the degree of blood alcohol concentration, and the records of having been punished three times as a fine for drunk driving and unlicensed driving prior to the instant case);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act)

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;