On August 6, 2014, at around 11:00, the Defendant and B entered a mountain field cultivated by the victim D, the victim D in the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the C of the purchase of the mountain ginseng and the yellow ginseng cultivated therein with the intent to steal the mountain ginseng and the yellow ginseng cultivated therein, and then, the Defendant and B of the C of the 12-year C of the mountain ginseng of the 12-year C of the C of the 35 ppuri (total amounting to 4

As a result, the defendant and B stolen the victim's property equivalent to the total amount of 6,50,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant and B;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation [the scope of recommending punishment] [the range of recommending punishment] the mitigated area (from April to October) (the value of a sentence] mitigated area (the value of a stolen victim), the value of the stolen victim's goods, the criminal records, the criminal records of the defendant, the victim, and the fact that the judgment in this case can lose its validity if it becomes final and conclusive, etc.