beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.09.06 2013고단2331

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(장물)

Text

Defendant

A and B Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, Defendant C and F for six months, Defendant D and E for four months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A of criminal records was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence in August of the same month and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 15th of the same month, and is currently under suspended sentence.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A purchased a mobile phone or stolen mobile phone in the taxi and supplied a mobile phone to H, a business operator exporting it to Hong Kong, the taxi passengers, are the total liability for purchasing the mobile phone. A secured a local stolen purchase policy and made the taxi engineer know about the method of purchasing the lost mobile phone from the taxi engineer, and made the taxi engineer know about the method of purchasing the lost mobile phone, and paid the large phone, name card, and purchase price, etc. necessary for committing the crime, and distributed the purchase policy to the name of the "purchase of the lost mobile phone" centering on the taxi stop, and then purchased the mobile phone from the taxi engineer.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Habitual Acquisition) around June 2, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “B”), provided Defendant B with spophones and cards, purchase funds, and purchased ten cell phones from Cheongju area with the knowledge that Defendant B purchased ten cell phones from Cheongju area with the aforementioned spophones and name cards, and purchased ten cell phones from Cheongju area with the knowledge that they were purchasing ten cell phoness from Cheongju area with the said spophones, and purchased 332 cell phoness from Defendant B over 20 times from February 18, 2013 through the same method, such as the list 1 of the crimes committed in the attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to acquire stolen goods habitually.

2. Defendant A’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Habitual Acquisition) and Defendant C’s acquisition of stolen goods, around June 25, 2012, provided that Defendant C with a name tag stating “the purchase of Handphones” from the Cheong-si, Chungcheongbuk-si, and notified Defendant C of the purchase method of handphones and cautions.