2. Although the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime and the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the amount of damage caused by the instant crime does not seem to be relatively large, the Defendant committed the instant crime, despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times by imprisonment with prison labor due to the same multiple methods as the instant crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime against a large number of victims, committed the instant crime, and the Defendant did not have any minimum effort to recover damage, as well as did not reach agreement with the victims, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered as being too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant and his defense counsel’s allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.