A. As stated in the facts charged, the Defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim’s right fingers of the victim E, on the part of the victim, for about four weeks of medical treatment. There was no injury on the part of the victim, such as the mouth of the first bones of the right fingers.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The written diagnosis of injury submitted by the victim of the crime of injury in relation to the assertion of mistake of fact is generally considered to have identified the cause of injury based on the victim's statement, and the part and degree of the injury observed and judged by using medical expertise, and it is insufficient to form evidence to directly prove the fact that the injury as stated therein was caused by the criminal act of the defendant. However, in a case where the date and time of the diagnosis of the injury are close to the time and the time of the occurrence of the injury, there are no special circumstances to suspect the credibility of the injury in the process of issuing the written diagnosis of injury, and where the victim's injury part and degree are consistent with the cause and circumstance of the injury alleged by the victim, unless there are special circumstances such as the victim's act of violence from a third party or the fact that the doctor prepared a false written diagnosis of injury is revealed, such diagnosis of injury is sufficient to prove the fact that the injury was caused by the criminal act of the defendant, and the probative value of the injury cannot be dismissed without reasonable grounds.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do12728, Jan. 27, 201). The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do12728, Jan. 27, 201). The purport of the following is that the victim incurred the Defendant’s loss from the investigative agency to the lower court, thereby making the Defendant’s loss,