beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.15 2016고단7808

국민체육진흥법위반(도박개장등)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

Defendant

A 687,436,590 won;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

E received from the F “GH, I, etc.” on a private sports soil site from around 2011, and controlled the operation of the gambling site, such as office management, settlement of profits, and distribution. Defendant A and J as a one-person team leader, Defendant B and K are in charge of the management of members, earnings, and the settlement of accounts, and L, M, N, andO, as the class of the one-person team leader, are in charge of the members management, earnings, and the duties of the respective member management, the accounts of profits, and the duties of L, M, N, andO, under the condition that they receive monthly wages from E. In order to operate the said private sports soil site in order.

According to the above public offering, the Defendants: (a) from around April 25, 2011 to around July 5, 2011; (b) from around July 5, 2011 to around May 29, 2015, Defendant B registered a sports game on the private website “G” in P 6dong 1001, etc.; (c) while managing the bulletin board, the Defendants received from the members of the above site the minimum amount of KRW 5,00 to the maximum amount of KRW 1,00,000 from the members of the above site to the maximum amount of KRW 1,00,000,000 from the members, including Q Q 112 financial accounts; (d) from around July 5, 201 to around May 29, 201, Defendant B received the total amount of money transferred to each member; and (e) received dividends from the members of the above site to pay dividends in line with the domestic and foreign sports games; and (d) received the total amount of KRW 136,575,79,5,797,5,797.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with E, J, K, L, M, N, andO, opened and operated an Internet sports discussions site, issued things similar to the sports promotion voting rights and provided property or property benefits to those who correctly predicted the outcome, and opened a gambling space for profit-making purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Defendants and ..