On October 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at D convenience points located in C when light lighting around 02:30 on October 28, 2017; (b) whether the victim E (30) who is an employee of the above convenience store under the influence of alcohol would not receive the value of the envelope.

Cp has committed assaulting the victim's face at one time on the ground that he heard that he or she would be able to say that he or she "h" is "h so living" and that he or she was "h so living."

Summary of Evidence

1. E statements;

1. Application of CCTV video recording CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the following reasons: (a) Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime under the relevant provision of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes (the Defendant has been sentenced to 15 times of violence; (b) the Defendant does not reflect the crime of this case; (c) the Defendant does not agree with the victim; (d) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on February 10, 2017; and (e) was sentenced to a fine for assault on May 31, 2017; and (e) again committed the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant becomes subject to a suspended sentence upon the confirmation of the sentence of this case).